Thursday, February 26, 2009

AMNESTY’S SCANDALOUS OBLIQUITY

By Khalid Amayreh in occupied East Jerusalem

Palestinians incinerated to death by Israel’s White Phosphorous bombs

In an apparent effort to sound “balanced” and “unbiased,” the London-based human rights group, Amnesty International (AI) , has urged the international community to halt arms sales to the Israeli apartheid regime and the Palestinian Islamic liberation movement, Hamas.



A report issued by the group on Sunday, 22 February, pointed out that arms supplied to “the two sides” were used in attacks on civilians and civilian objects” which constituted war crimes.


Non the less, a careful examination of the report shows a clear propensity on the part of AI to create a false symmetry between Hamas, a small liberation movement resisting a decades-old Nazi-like foreign military occupation, and Israel, a manifestly criminal state armed to the teeth, which has been committing every conceivable crime under the sun for the purpose of maintaining its colonialist occupation and brutal domination over the Palestinian people.


To be sure, no one claims that Hamas is completely blameless. Targeting innocent civilians is unacceptable.


However, equating the resistance of a long-persecuted people languishing under an evil military occupation, even if wrongs are done, with an immensely superior state terror unjustifiably perpetrated by an occupying power is morally unconscionable, to say the very least.


Indeed, doing so would be analogous to equating European resistance to the attacking Nazi armies during the Second World War, with the Nazi aggression itself.


Well, with all due respect to AI and its efforts to safeguard and defend human rights, there is no legal or moral equation between a rape victim’s right to defend herself against her attacker and the criminal act initiated by the rapist.


I am using this analogy because the enduring Israeli oppression meted out to the Palestinian people is an enduring act of rape.


Yes, firing home-made and other comparatively primitive projectiles on Israeli civilians is a regrettable act. However, the firing of these projectiles, which killed a few Israelis in 10 years of hostilities (virtually one Israeli per year), can’t be compared with the nearly complete annihilation of Gaza’s civilian infrastructure and wholesale murder of thousands of innocent men, women and children.


The excessive, disproportionate and often pornographic use of deadly violence against an essentially imprisoned and unprotected civilian population is more than just a mere miscalculation or faulty reasoning It is rather a deliberate war crime the perpetrators of which are vile war criminals who ought to be prosecuted and punished for their crimes.


More to the point, it is imperative that one gives context if one is truly interested in producing an honest and objective analysis of the recent outrage in Gaza.


Hence, one must be honest enough to remember that Israel had been forcing the 1.5 million Gazans to choose between dying quietly by succumbing to a genocidal hermetic siege that pushed most of the region’s inhabitants to the brink of a silent holocaust, or fighting back, using whatever primitive and extremely limited means at their disposal.


I strongly believe it is absurd and ludicrous, if not outright malicious, to compare Hamas with Israel as far as the use of violence is concerned.


Hamas is a small movement of persecuted Palestinians who have been on the receiving end of Israeli persecution and repression. Hamas poses no real or strategic threat to Israel, a military superpower which also, to a large extent, controls American politics and policies.


In its recent genocidal onslaught on Gaza, Israel used the deadliest weapons of death, including F-16 warplanes, apache helicopters, Merkava tanks, heavy artillery, depleted uranium, chemical agents that eat through the human flesh and eventually cause death, white Phosphorus, dart shells and a variety of other lethal weapons.


On the other hand, Hamas used notoriously primitive weapons, mainly to deter Israel from carrying out a genocide on a wider scale.


During that blitz, Israel knowingly and deliberately targeted civilian neighborhoods, apartment buildings, private homes, mosques, college dorms, university buildings, UN-run schools, grocery stores and businesses. It was a no-holds-barred rampage of murder and terror against an imprisoned and thoroughly starved civilian population.


As a result, as many as 7000 Palestinians were murdered, or maimed and injured, many with life-long deformities. Moreover, hundreds of thousands of other Gazans suffered long-lasting psychological traumas.


On the Israeli side, we are talking about a dozen Israeli fatalities , some of whom killed or injured by “friendly fire.”


So, we are dealing with an extremely lopsided situation where the death ratio is nearly 1 -100. Needless to say, one doesn’t have to be a great military expert to realize that this is not really a war, it is rather a huge massacre.


This is why, AI is called upon to call the spade a spade and refrain from hiding behind technical jargons that not only fail to communicate the facts about what really happened in Gaza but also give a false impression of symmetry in guilt between Israel and Hamas.


More to the point, it is important to remember that Israel didn’t impose the draconian blockade of Gaza as a retaliation for the largely innocuous firing of projectiles onto Israel. The criminal blockade was imposed, first and foremost, as a cruel punishment of Palestinians for electing a political party that Israel didn’t like.


Hence, the imposition of the siege, which is continuing unabated, is per se a war crime or a crime against humanity.


The world betrayed them, the Arab world stood silent, with some Arab regimes even colluding with Israel to perfect the siege in the hope that Gazans would turn against Hamas and bring it down.


And the hypocritical West had the audacity to blame the victims while babbling, as usual, about Israel’s right to defend itself.


This happened while an entire people was being imprisoned, starved, tormented and quietly exterminated, mainly for political reasons pertaining to Israeli territorial aggrandizement.


In short, it was the Nazi-like Israeli savaging of the Palestinians that made Palestinian resistance inevitable. The Palestinians, long tormented by this cruel occupation, have every legal and moral right to resist, using whatever means available to them.


Indeed, instead of blaming the victims for resisting their oppressors, the world, including AI , ought to tell Israel that it can’t just incarcerate 1.5 million civilians within the confines of an open-air prison, surrounded by barbed wire, watchtowers, tanks, landmines, and other state-of-the-art machines of death, and then expect the victims to display love and understanding toward their tormentors and oppressors.


Israel did transform the Gaza Strip into a real concentration camp, by denying the prisoner population access to fuel, electricity, food, medicine, medical care, and basic consumer products.


Meanwhile, the Israeli death machine never stopped murdering innocent Palestinians, nearly on a daily basis.


It is essential that AI and other human rights groups take these facts into account when dealing with the situation in Gaza.


Failing to do so, by cowering before Israeli pressure, would further corrode AI image as the world’s premier human rights organization.

PALESTINIANS RECONSIDER TWO-STATE STRATEGY

By Khalid Amayreh

RAMALLAH — While the west-backed Palestinian Authority is still clinging to the two-state solution as the only feasible strategy for ending the 40-year Israeli occupation, a growing number of Palestinian intellectuals and lay people are coming to the conclusion that the creation of a viable Palestinian state is no longer possible in light of the ubiquitous proliferation of Jewish settlements.

“There is no doubt that the two-state solution is dead. In fact it has been dead for quite a long time,” Laila el-Haddad, a Gaza-based writer, told IslamOnline.net.

“The metastasizing of Jewish settlements, along with the overriding deliberate policies of ‘politicide’ have rendered the two-state solution impossible,” she believes.

With their horizons constantly narrowed and lingering peace talks with Israel reaching a virtual dead-end, mainly over Israel’s refusal to give up the spoils of the 1967 war, Palestinians are increasingly advocating the one-state solution.

“The only feasible, sustainable, and just solution is One state, with equal rights for all,” says el-Haddad.

According to public opinion surveys, faith in the two-state solution has been steadily dwindling among Palestinians as they watch unmitigated Jewish settlement expansion swallows up more and more of their land.

Since 1967, Israel has built more than 150 Jewish-only settlements on the occupied West Bank, inhabited by as many as half a million settlers.

Most of the settlers are classified as “ideological settlers,” who believe that the West Bank is the “Biblical Land of Israel” which must never be given up even in return for a lasting peace with the Palestinians.

Hence, many observers have come to believe that no Israeli government will be able, even if willing, to dismantle these large settlements which have become well-established demographic realities in the occupied territories.

At the same time, there is a near unanimity among Palestinians and Arabs that without the elimination of at least the bulk of settlements and removal of most settlers, the goal of Palestinian statehood will be utterly unachievable.

During the last few months, Ahmed Qurei’, chief negotiator and Fatah leader, warned that the PA would decide to abandon the peace process with Israel if “it becomes clear that the creation of a viable Palestinian state is no longer possible.”

“We certainly will resort to the one-state solution. We will not allow Israel to impose apartheid on us for ever.”

Tough Choices

Hazem al-Qawasmi, an economist and prominent proponent of the one-state solution, argues that there is no viable alternative to it.

“We must not be made to pay the price for Jewish settlement expansion. Israel has effectively killed the two-state solution for the purpose of liquidating the Palestinian cause,” he told IOL.

“Hence, the Palestinians ought to struggle for a unitary and democratic state which would preserve our national existence and continued survival,” he believes.

“The alternative would be national demise, especially in the long run.”

Palestinians in general are fully aware that the one-state strategy is fraught with problems and having no guaranteed consequences.

The firm Israeli rejection of the idea makes many Palestinians refrain from wholly embracing the quest for the one-state solution.

They also think that decades of violence and bloodshed would make the implementation of this vision very unlikely.

“The world is under no more of a moral or legal obligation to maintain Zionism in Israel than it was to maintain apartheid in South Africa,” Qawasmi insists.

“The Palestinian people’s right to freedom and human rights override whatever rights Israel thinks it has to remain Jewish.”

Palestinians opposed to the idea argue that Palestinian weakness vis-à-vis Israel doesn’t allow the Palestinian people and their leadership to handle the one-state idea successfully.

Ziad abu Ziad, a former Palestinian negotiator, believes that most Israelis are not ready for peace and that the Israeli political leadership is unable to effect a real transformation in the public mood.

“We can’t escape the fact that the expanding settlements leave no room for a prospective Palestinian state,” he told IOL.

“I think that we should work on three levels. First, to guarantee the steadfastness of our people. Second, to try on the short term to mobilize international pressure on Israel to force it to stop its settlement activities as a step toward removing Jewish colonies from the occupied territories,” maintains abu Ziad.

“Third, in the long term, we should prepare ourselves for a long , durable struggle to recover our rights.”

Monday, February 23, 2009

THIS IS WHAT WAS BANNED AT CARLETON UNIVERSITY IN CANADA


Israeli Apartheid Week (IAW) is an annual international series of events held in cities and campuses across the globe. The aim of IAW is to educate people about the nature of Israel as an apartheid system
and to build Boycott, Divestment, and Sanctions (BDS) campaigns as part of a growing global BDS movement.
Israeli Apartheid Week (IAW) is taking place in more than 40 cities across the globe (the number of cities is growing daily). This year, IAW happens in the wake of Israel’s barbaric assault on the people of
Gaza. Lectures, films, and actions will make the point that these latest massacres further confirm the true nature of Israeli Apartheid. IAW 2009 will continue to build and strengthen the growing Boycott, Divestment, and Sanctions (BDS) movement at a global level.

ZIONIST DOG ATTACKS 100 YEAR OLD PALESTINIAN

One would think it is bad enough that the Israeli army constantly targets and kills innocent children…..but why stop at that? 100 year old people at rest in their own homes and beds are also equal and defenseless targets.
They can always ‘blame it on the dog’ just as we did when our homework wasn’t finished…..

100 year-old man attacked by Israeli army dog

In the early morning of February 20th at 2am, Israeli Forces invaded the town of Tamoun, located in the Tubas region of the northern occupied West Bank. Around 50 soldiers in seven jeeps surrounded two houses in the town, firing sound bombs and live ammunition before breaking into the residences.

Salem Fadel Bani Odeh (100)

Salem Fadel Bani Odeh (100)

During the course of the invasion, an army attack dog mauled the face of Salem Fadel Bani Odeh, aged 100 while he lay helpless in his bed. Two men, Na’el Odeh Bani Odeh, aged 23, Muhamad Mustafa Bani Odeh, aged 25, were also arrested by Israeli Occupation Forces. The windows of a nearby parked car were all shot out by army gunfire.

Salem Fadel Bani Odeh awoke to the explosions of sound bombs and live bullets. The door to his home was smashed down by soldiers, who entered the house and ordered everyone outside. But Salem, who is partially paralyzed and bedridden, could not move. As the soldiers searched the house, an army dog leaped up onto his bed and began biting his face and chest. Though nearly ten soldiers were inside the same room, they did nothing to stop the attack, and the dog continued to knaw on Salem’s face. Finally, after more than half an hour, the soldiers stopped the dog and called for an ambulance. Salem was taken to Rafidia Hospital in Nablus, where he remains in moderate condition with parts of one ear bitten off and bites on his face, chest and right shoulder.

dscn3062

According to Ha’aretz, the Israeli army has admitted that the incident occurred.

Source

Thursday, February 5, 2009

HAMAS’ POPULARITY SOARING FOLLOWING ISRAEL’S GAZA BLITZ

By Khalid Amayreh in Ramallah

The latest public opinion survey in the West Bank and Gaza Strip has shown a dramatic rise in Hamas’ popularity among Palestinians, with a significant decline in Fatah’s public standing.


Moreover, the poll showed that a majority of Palestinians believed that the advent of the Obama administration in the U.S. wouldn’t make a big difference with regard to American efforts to resolve the Palestinian issue.


According to the poll, Turkey, Venezuela and Iran as well as Hezbullah are the most popular regional forces among Palestinians.


The results of the latest poll, conducted by the Jerusalem Media and Communications Center (JMCC) from 29-31 January, showed that nearly 48 % of respondents believed that Hamas came out of the Israeli blitz against Gaza victorious. Nearly 10 per cent opined that Israel won the war, while over a third of respondents, 37.4% said that neither side achieved victory.


The poll, surveying a random sample of 1,198 respondents, found a dramatic rise in the popularity of Hamas, especially in the West Bank.


In contrast, the popularity of the Fatah movement suffered a significant decline, especially in the West Bank.


When asked if general Palestinian elections were held today, 28.6% of respondents said they would vote for Hamas. Fatah’s standing declined from 34% last April to 27.9 in this poll.


According to the latest poll, trust in Hamas rose from 16.6% last November to 27.7 % in this poll. In contrast, the percentage of those who said they trusted Fatah fell down from 31.3% to 26%.


According to a press release by the JMCC, the rise in Hamas’ popularity occurred mainly in the West Bank, which is controlled by the Western Backed Palestinian Authority.


Similarly, the percentage of those who said they trusted Ismael Haniya, the Prime Minister of the Gaza-based Palestinian government, increased from 12.8% last October to 21.1 in this poll. Trust in PA Chairman Mahmoud Abbas went down from 15.5% last October to 13.4 in this poll.


The poll showed that the percentage of those opining that the performance of the American-backed government of Salam Fayad is better than that of the Gaza-based government declined significantly from 36% last April to 26.9% in this poll.


However, those who believed that the performance of the Fayad government is worse than that of the Haniya’s government rose substantially from 29.1 to 40% per cent.


The latest poll also found that support for military resistance against the Israeli occupation rose from 49.5% last April to 53.5% in this poll.


Moreover, the poll showed a rise in the percentage of Palestinians opposed to peace talks with Israel.


Turkey, Venezuela and several other political and other entities have also become more popular among Palestinians, according to the latest poll.


Turkey received the highest point of 89.6 %, followed by Venezuela (80.6 %) .


The International Committee of the Red Cross received a satisfaction mark of (79. 8) followed by UNRWA (78.6 %).


Qatar received a satisfaction mark of 68.3%, Hezbullah 66.9 %, the Muslim Brotherhood movement 57.6 % and Iran 55.9%.


The US received the satisfaction of only 2.8 of respondents, Britain, 10.4%, Germany 14.4 % France was the western country that received the satisfaction of the highest percentage of respondents, at 21.5 per cent.


Egypt and Jordan received 35.1% and 41.7 % respectively.


Finally, when asked which entity you would prefer to assume the task of reconstruction in the Gaza Strip, respondents gave the following answers: A majority of 30.6% said they prefer an international mechanism under UN supervision to assume this task. The second choice was for a Palestinian national unity government to oversee the reconstruction. More than 23% said they preferred the government of Hamas to do the job, while a minority of 13.7 % said they prefer the Palestinian Authority to assume the task.


The decline in Fatah’s popularity can be attributed to the widespread public dissatisfaction with the Ramallah regime’s lukewarm stance during the war.


Many Palestinians had the impression that at least some of the PA and PLO leaders adopted a “conspiratorial stance” during the Israeli invasion of Gaza.


Some PA officials had reportedly made remarks voicing the hope that Israeli would destroy the Hamas government in Gaza.


Some PLO leaders, such as Yasser Abed Rabbo, reportedly criticized Israel for ending the war too soon without “finishing off Hamas.”


Another important reason for Fatah’s dwindling popularity seems to have to do with the widespread suppression by PA security forces of public descent during the war.


PA security agencies prevented and in many instances violently suppressed pro-Hamas protests during the war.


Dozens of Palestinians, mainly Hamas sympathizers, have also been arrested by the PA security apparatus in the West Bank.


The latest opinion poll is not going to be a good news for PA Chairman Mahmoud Abbas.


Abbas has been calling for early presidential and legislative elections in the West Bank, East Jerusalem and Gaza Strip in the hope of ending Hamas’ government in the Gaza Strip.

ISRAELI FASCIST’S HISTORY EXPOSED

(Ben Heine © Cartoons)

BTW….. the image to the left was the reason Benjamin Heine was banned from Daily Kos, and me as well for defending him…..

Now HaAretz itself exposes this evil man as a fascist of long standing….
Truth slowly trickles out.

Elections 2009 / Haaretz exclusive: Avigdor Lieberman was member of outlawed radical Kach movement

By Lily Galili
Yisrael Beiteinu chairman Avigdor Lieberman was once a member of the
outlawed far-right party Kach, the movement’s former secretary general revealed on Tuesday.

Yossi Dayan said he issued Lieberman, a prime ministerial candidate whose current electoral campaign against Israeli Arabs has provoked outrage, with a party membership card when he was still a new immigrant to Israel. Kach was banned from running for the Knesset in 1988 for inciting to racism.

“I don’t recall to what extent he was active in the movement, but if he denies [this], I am ready to testify in any forum that Lieberman was indeed a member for a short amount of time,” said Dayan.

Ultra-nationalist activist Avigdor Eskin, meanwhile, remembers meeting Lieberman at Kahane’s office on Ussishkin Street in Jerusalem. “I remember this very well, because I arrived there one day after I immigrated to Israel in 1979,” he said.

Eskin came to public attention for having boasted of holding a pulsa dinura ceremony prior to 1995 assassination of prime minister Yitzhak Rabin. The ceremony, believed to be of kabbalistic origin, is aimed at conferring a death curse on the subject.

“Kahane saw him as a good guy. I also thought back then that he was not a Kach man ideologically, unless the only measure of this is the question of whether you like Arabs. According to what I remember, he handed out the movements’ publications among its small student group in the Hebrew University,” Eskin said.

He added that he met Lieberman in Kahane’s office a number of times, but to the best of his knowledge the Yisrael Beiteinu chairman was only involved in Kach for a number of months.

Yisrael Beiteinu relayed in response to the Haaretz report that, “We are not dealing with this orchestrated provocation. The success of Yisrael Beiteinu has created among its opponents a great quantity of lies and fabrications, which the political and media establishment knew beforehand.”

The revelation came one day after Israel’s most recognizable television anchor, Haim Yavin, branded Lieberman as “Kahane’s successor,” a reference to the murdered extremist Rabbi Meir Kahane, who headed Kach movement.

Former Kach members, for their part, actually reject the Kahane comparison. “He is a poor imitation of Kahane,” one said. Dayan, who was close to Kahane for over a decade, is disgusted by it.

“Not everyone who speaks against Arabs is a Kahane,” he said. “[Lieberman] can take a few elements, but to be Kahane is a whole doctrine. Nevertheless, I’m happy that he’s saying what he’s saying, because without a radical solution to the problem of Arabs in Israel it can’t be good here.”

ISRAELI WAR CRIMES BEING ‘LOOKED INTO’

Israel is great at…..

Image ‘Copyleft’ by Carlos Latuff

THE NOT SO NORMAL LIFE IN GAZA TODAY

Image by David Baldinger


AMIRA HASS / Life in the Gaza Strip is not ‘back to normal’
GAZA - “Only aerial photographs of the Gaza Strip will make it possible to show and to comprehend the extent of the destruction,” a number of Western civilians said this week. They added: “But there isn’t a chance that Israel will allow anyone to come with a light plane and do aerial photography.”
The talk of aerial photography reveals the frustration felt by everyone who has managed to come here. The frustration derives from the conclusion that the real dimensions of the Israeli attack on Gaza are not being fully comprehended in the West and in Israel. They go beyond the physical destruction, beyond the numbers of the dead and the wounded, beyond the deadly encounter between a bomb dropped from an F-16 and the hollow concrete and gravel house in the Yibneh refugee camp in Rafah. Three siblings aged 4 to 12 were killed there. Parents and two sisters were injured. The mother - who was nursing her infant daughter and heard and saw the bomb rushing towards them - is in a state of shock. She stares out at the world from her hospital bed in Egypt, and does not speak. The physical injuries can be treated.

Volunteer doctors, architects who specialize in the rehabilitation of disaster zones, jurists whose aspirations reach into international courts for the investigation of war crimes, Red Cross teams, international human rights organization investigators with battle experience behind them, directors of government and independent development agencies, which transfer funds from development budgets to budgets for rehabilitation and rescue: All of them - not only journalists - are flooding the Strip, taking notes, taking pictures, exchanging information, documenting and carefully cataloguing what are emerging as patterns, phenomena that repeat themselves: shelling and bombing of buildings and enterprises that have no connection to the Hamas infrastructure - politically or militarily, the prevention of the evacuation of wounded, unfamiliar kinds of injuries, vandalism in homes that became Israel Defense Forces positions, destruction of agricultural areas and, above all, families - almost in their entirety - that were killed in their homes or as they tried to flee from the approaching tanks. This is the hardest work of documentation.

People have their own ways of trying to characterize their personal disaster: People whose homes or small businesses have been destroyed in the shelling and bombardments, though no one in their family was killed, say: “My damage is nothing,” as though embarrassed. This could be heard from a pharmacist and pharmaceuticals importer, whose warehouse of medications, the only on in the southern Gaza Strip, was bombarded. And nearly the same words were spoken by three brothers - a doctor, an engineer and a lecturer on biochemistry at Al Azhar University, whose family home in the eastern part of Jabalya was shelled with many different kinds of ammunition by the IDF. The house is included in the statistic of 17,000 homes that were partially destroyed, but it appears that it will be easier to raze it than to repair it.


“Tell Moshe and Kadosh from Moshav Mivtahim that the salaries they paid me for many years have been lost under the tanks of the Israel Defense Forces,” said a farmer from the area of Fukhari, east of Khan Yunis - and insisted on saying this in Hebrew. His house is a number in the statistic of about 4,000 homes that the IDF destroyed completely. In this agricultural area - “which in fact is called Kfar Shalom (Peace Village),” said some of its inhabitants, 92 houses were destroyed entirely and raked away along with their fields and groves and the livestock in them. We came there looking for an IDF position from which soldiers fired on Ibrahim Shurrab and his two sons: Kassab and Muhammad. The story of their killing has already been told in these pages. On January 16, during the daily cessation of fire, they were returning from their field to their home in Khan Yunis. One military position in a tank, at the end of the street, allowed them to keep driving. But from the second position they were shot at, from a distance of about 30 to 50 meters, as the father related. The position was in a house the inhabitants of which had fled several days earlier, together with all the people of the neighborhood. From the shooting, Kassab died on the spot. Muhammad, who was wounded in his leg, bled to death. The IDF allowed an ambulance to reach the site only about 23 hours later.

On Monday, on one of the walls of the house that became the IDF position from which soldiers shot the two brothers who died at their father’s side, we found two inscriptions in Hebrew: “The Jewish people lives” and “Kahane was right,” referring to right-wing extremist Rabbi Meir Kahane.

Everyone we meet has a tremendous need to tell his story. In minute detail. Again and again. Adnan told how he was saved from death seven times; Kauthar related how she fled with her children as the bullets and shells shrieked overhead and Taleb, in a tired voice, told how after 12 days in which he had lost all contact, the body of his sister and the body of her son, riddled with bullets, were found in their home in Beit Lahiya. This is the sort of thing that is impossible to quantify: The unending horror, for three weeks, the worry, the impotence, the thoughts that never leave about the relative who has bled to death, a meter or a kilometer away. In Gaza today, as students are returning to school and cars are again driving along the roads, the commonplace “life is slowly going back to normal” is more hollow and false than ever.

However, a count of the dead and the wounded is possible. And it has been and is being done. There is a difference of 85 dead between the figures that have been published by the Palestinian Ministry of Health and those that have been arrived at by the two leading human rights centers in the Gaza Strip - Mezan and the Palestinian Center for Human Rights. This gap, however, is not a result of an intentional inflation of the number of dead and wounded, but rather the result of a number of errors that occurred because of the heavy load: For example, in the aerial bombardment on Saturday, December 27, of the civilian police buildings in Gaza City, seven students of the nearby UNRWA vocational school were killed. All of them - inhabitants of Rafah. It is possible that they were listed twice - once as people from Rafah who were killed and once as people killed in Gaza City. There were people who were taken to Shifa Hospital who when they died were transferred to hospitals in the places where they had lived. It has happened that by mistake a number of names were listed twice. Sometimes there is an error in the name, which is later corrected. Sometimes neither a corpse nor remains have been located. In this way, the body of H., an Iz al-Din al-Qassam member, was lost. Only his shoes, which were found, confirmed that he had been killed. Four members of the Haddad family, parents and two children, got into a car and fled the army that was approaching the Tel al Hawwa neighborhood. A shell incinerated the car. The neighbors were able to identify the four scorched corpses only by the license number of the car, and they reported this to an investigator from the Palestinian Center. Nor is anyone able to intentionally lessen the number of Palestinian fighters who were killed. Every family is proud to say that its son fought and was killed in battle, so that sometimes the error could be the other way around: that someone is called a fighter because a certain organization adopted him, but in fact he was killed in his home and did not even know how to fire a rifle. Investigators who are very familiar with the field have their own ways of knowing who was an armed fighter and who was not. When on January 14 there was a report of four corpses in Shokka, east of Rafah, the field worker from the Palestinian Center knew the name of one of the dead and knew that he was from Iz al-Din al-Qassam. He concluded that two of the others, who were his age, were also in the military organization. However, the fourth man was 42 years old when he was killed, which is not so congruent with the profile of a “fighter,” and inquiries to his family confirmed that indeed he had no connection to the armed group.

In the two human rights organizations the confirmation of the names of those killed, their identity, their age and their sex is carried out in a number of ways: In real time, each of the organizations had field workers present at the hospitals. They saw the bodies and spoke with family members. Other investigators did everything in their power - in conditions of mortal danger and running between the bombardments - to get to the place where people were killed and wounded. If not there - then to the home of the family or the wake house. If this was not possible during the course of events - it is being done now. Each investigator has a detailed questionnaire that he goes over with all the affected families and in which all the details are recorded. The work of getting everything down in writing will take at least a month and a half or two months. Then in all likelihood the slight gaps in the figures of the two human rights centers will be corrected.

The data, according to the Palestinian Center for Human Rights, as of January 22, are as follows: 1,285 dead, of whom 1,062 were non-combatants (895 civilians and 167 civilian police). Of these, 281 were children (21.8 percent) and 111 were women. There are 4,336 wounded, among them 1,133 children. The 6-year-old girl who we saw in the Zeytun neighborhood, who holds her hands up in the air in fear every time the photographer brings his camera near her, is not included in the list of the casualties.

PEACE WITHOUT JUSTICE



Israeli occupation on gaza
A view in Beit Dajan (Jaffa District) soon after Nakba where you can see the persecuted European Jews who had usurped a Palestinian shop.

By Abu al-Sous (Salah Mansour)*

Since the inception of the Zionists movement, its founders and the Western Powers proclaimed that if Arabs accepted the Zionist vision (which aims to turn Palestine to a “Jewish majority state”), then “peace”, prosperity, and democracy shall follow soon after. Paradoxically, what happened on the ground has been the complete the opposite. It should be noted that up to this date, all Arab countries who accepted the Western version of “peace” and recognized the “Jewish state” have become

  • more repressive against their own people,
  • have the best intelligence services and torture centers the West can to offer,
  • their democracy is almost non-existent at all levels, and
  • their economies cannot survive without foreign aid.

Because this version of “peace” ignores that facts that the Palestinian people have been ethnically cleansed and dispossessed of their homeland, it’s extremely unpopular among Arabs. Consequently, Western Powers have resorted to all sorts of methods to impose this version of “peace” on Arab regimes, and as a result repression and corruption have reached unprecedented levels. The examples in the Arab World are too many to enumerate, especially in the occupied West Bank and Egypt.

Such a version of “peace” requires the West and Israel to continuously shore up corrupt Arab regimes to prolong the unpopular “peace” treaties with Israel, and without corruption and repression these unpopular treaties won’t last for a day. As repression and corruption increases, these Arab regimes become even more unpopular which entails even more sustainable repression and corruption. This vicious circle of repression and corruption (which are required to sustain this version of “peace”) has become a kind of a ponzi or a pyramid scheme that will eventually crumble under its own weight. If history can be a judge, this version of “peace” (which is based on usurping Palestinian national rights) will be a curse on the Arab regimes and people who choose it as their path. In that respect, it is helpful to point out that even David Ben-Gurion (the first Israeli Prime Minister) recognized that peace without justice is simply impossible, he stated in 1919:

“Everybody sees the problem in the relations between the Jews and the Arabs. But not everybody sees that there’s no solution to it. There is no solution! . . . The conflict between the interests of the Jews and the interests of the Arabs in Palestine cannot be resolved by sophisms. I don’t know any Arabs who would agree to Palestine being ours—even if we learn Arabic . . .and I have no need to learn Arabic. On the other hand, I don’t see why ‘Mustafa’ should learn Hebrew. . . . There’s a national question here. We want the country to be ours. The Arabs want the country to be theirs.” (One Palestine Complete, p. 116)

Similarly, Ze’ev Jabotinsky (one of the most influential Zionists leaders) recognized that Arabs will accept Zionist vision only by the force of arms, he stated in his famous iron wall article in 1923:

“…. Settlement can thus develop under the protection of a force that is not dependent on the local population, behind an iron wall which they will be powerless to break down. ….a voluntary agreement is just not possible. As long as the Arabs preserve a gleam of hope that they will succeed in getting rid of us, nothing in the world can cause them to relinquish this hope, precisely because they are not a rubble but a living people. And a living people will be ready to yield on such fateful issues only when they give up all hope of getting rid of the Alien Settlers. Only then will extremist groups with their slogan ‘No, never’ lose their influence, and only then their influence be transferred to more moderate groups. And only then will the moderates offer suggestions for compromise. Then only will they begin bargaining with us on practical matters, such as guarantees against pushing them out, and equality of civil, and national rights.”

“Peace” without justice for the Palestinian people is equivalent to some kind of a financial transaction between individuals not people. The Palestinian people are a patient people and like all people eager for a justice peace; they shall wait for the day when a just and lasting peace comes.

Our DATE is 60 years LATE, God willing sooner or later we shall return.
* Salah Mansour is the founder and editor of PalestineRemembered.com, the largest Palestinian online community.

Boycott israel
صورة نادرة للمغتصبين الصهاينة في قرية بيت دجن (محافظة يافا) تم إلتقاطها بعد النكبة وتظهر إحدى المحلات التي تم سرقتها من سكانها الفلسطينيين.

السلام غير العادل
بقلم أبو السوس (صلاح منصور)
منذ بداية الحركة الصهيونية، أعلن مؤسسيها وداعميها في العالم الغربي أنه إذا وافق العرب على المُخطط الصهيوني –الذي يطمح لتحويل فلسطين لدولة أغلبيتها من اليهود– فإنهم سينعمون بالسلام والرخاء الإقتصادي والديموقراطية. بالفعل قامت عدة دول عربية بالإعتراف “بالدولة اليهودية” ومُخططها الصهيوني في فلسطين ولكن النتيجة كانت معاكسة تماماً للتعهدات الغربية، فهذه الدول أصبحت:

  • تنعم بالمزيد من القمع وتراجع الحريات،
  • تنعم بدوائر مخابرات ومراكز تعذيب تعد من أحدث ما يُصدره العالم الغربي،
  • تنعم بديموقراطية شبه معدومة،
  • تنعم بفساد يشمل كافة طبقات المجتمع،
  • وتنعم بإقتصاد شبه مُنهار يمعتمد على المِنح الخارجية.

تحظى نظرة الدول الغربية “للسلام” في الشرق الأوسط بشعبية عربية شبه معدومة وذلك لأنها ترتكز على ظلم الشعب الفلسطيني ولأنها تنتقص من الحق العربي والإسلامي في فلسطين. ولذلك لجأت الدول الغربية وإسرائيل بإستخدام كافة أنواع الضغوطات لإلزام بعض الأنظمة العربية بالقبول بهذا “السلام” غير العادل. فبسبب إنعدام شعبية هذا “السلام” –المبني على اُسس ظالمة– إزداد القمع والفساد في الأنظمة العربية التي إعترفت بالدولة اليهوية، وهذا يقلص من شعبية تلك الأنظمة مما يُجبرها على إستخدام المزيد من القمع والفساد للمحافظة على سدة الحكم، فالفجوة ما بين الأنظمة وشعوبها تزداد ولا تقل.

فبإختصار، تمرير المفهوم الغربي والصهيوني “للسلام العادل” يتتطلب إفساد الأنظمة العربية وهذا يستوجب قمع وإفساد شعوبها، وبدون ذلك فإن معاهدات السلام المُوقعة مع “الدولة اليهودية” لن تصمد ليوم واحد؛ فالأمثلة على ذلك كثيرة خاصةً في الضفة الغربية المُحتلة وجمهورية مصر التي تعتمد على دوامة الفساد والإفساد للمحافظة على مراكزها. فللأسف الشديد إستمرارية هذه المُعاهدات يتتطلب المزيد من القمع والفساد، واُشبهها بأنظمة الإستثمار الهرمية التي ستنهار في يومٍ ليس ببعيد تحت وطأة وزنها. فالوعودات الغربية والصهيونية بالرخاء والسلام والديموقراطية تتحول أمام أعيننا للعنة على الأمة العربية، عسى أن يعتبر منها البعض الذين يتهافتون لتوقيع مُعاهدات “سلام” جديدة على حساب الحقوق العربية والإسلامية في فلسطين. وهنا تجدر الإشارة بأن ديفيد بن غوريون–أول رئيس وزراء إسرائيلي– إعترف بأن سلام عادل مع العرب غير ممكن مهما تم التلاعب بالكلمات، فقال في عام 1923:

“الكل يرى بأنه يوجد حل للمشكلة ما بين اليهود والعرب، ولكن لا يرى الجميع بأنه لا يوجد حلّ لهذه المشكلة. ليس هنالك حلّ! … فتضارب المصالح العربية واليهودية في فلسطين لا يمكن حله بالتلاعب بالكالمات … أنا لا أجد عربي يوافق بأن تتحول فلسطين لنا حتى وإن تكلمنا العربية ….. وعلى الجانب الآخر لماذا ينبغي على ((مصطفى)) تعلم العبرية … يوجد هنا تضارب بالأهداف الوطنية، فهم يريدون فلسطين لهم ونحن نريدها لنا.” (One Palestine Complete, p. 116)

وبالمثل إعترف زئيف جابوتنسكي –أحد أهم مؤسسي الفكر الصهيوني– بأن العرب لن يتقبلوا المُخطط الصهيوني إلا إذا فرض عليهم بقوة السلاح، ففي عام 1923 كتب في مقالته المشهورة ((الجدار الحديدي)):

“الإستيطان ممكن فقط من خلال الإعتماد على قوة السلاح وأن لا يعتمد على موافقة السكان الأصليين… فهذا الإستيطان ممكن فقط من وراء جدار حديدي يصعب إختراقه …. فالتوصل لإتفاق بملئ إرادة السكان اللأصليين ببساطة غير ممكن. فكلما بقي عند العرب البصيص من الأمل بإقتلاعنا، فإنهم لن يتخلون عن هذا الأمل مهما كان الثمن وذلك لأنهم ليسو بأنقاض بل شعب حي. والشعب الحي لا يتخلى عن أمور مصيرية إلا إذا فقد الأمل بالتخلص من المستوطنين الأجانب، وعندها سينتقل نفوذ المجموعات المُتطرفة التي ترفض التسوية معنا وينتقل نفودها الى مجموعات أكثر إعتدالاً وعندئذٍ المعتدلين سيقدمون إقتراحات للتسوية معنا وبعد ذلك يبدأون بالتفواض عن الأمور المصيرية، مثل ضمانات بعدم طردهم والمساومة على حقوقهم المدنية والوطنية.”

وهنا أطرح الأسئلة التالية:

  • ألم يتنبأ جابوتينسكي بما يحدث لنا الآن منذ أكثر من ثماني عقود؟
  • هل بإمكاننا الإعتبار مما قاله جابوتينسكي ؟

“السلام” في المفهوم الغربي والصهيوني هو مفهوم مُضلل لأنه يعتمد على نكران الحق العربي والإسلامي في فلسطين، وما هو إلا نوع من أنواع الصفقات التجارية التي لا تمت للسلام بأي صلة. فالشعب الفلسطيني شعب صبور يطمح بسلام عادل وشامل الذي سيضمن له كافة حقوقه الوطنية والمدنية خاصة حقوقه في العودة والتعويض. فالشعب الجزائري قدم تضحيات أكثر من الشعب الفلسطيني وتم إستعمار وإحتلال وطنه لأكثر من 130 سنة، ومع ذلك لم يتخلى الجزائريون عن أنملة من حقوقهم الوطنية. عسى أن تعتبر الشعوب الأنظمة العربية بالتجربة الجزائرية وأن تناصر الشعب الفلسطيني كما ناصرت الشعب الجزائري لضمان كافة الحقوق العربية والإسلامية في فلسطين، فصبرنا هو مفتاح الفرج والله الموفق.

فرحتنا فقط بعودتنا إن شاء الله
صلاح منصور / أبو السوس
شيكاغو - الولايات المتحدة

boycott baby killers